No Vaccination No Medical Treatments!

naturalnews.com printable article
Originally published February 28 2012

Pediatrician’s refusal to treat unvaccinated kids: Legal and ethical ramifications
by Alan Phillips, J.D.

(NaturalNews) The following is a letter to U.S. Pediatricians who refuse to treat unvaccinated kids whose parents are exercising a legal exemption to immunizations. A copy of the letter itself is here:
Open Letter to Pediatricians

Attention: Pediatricians
United States of America

Re: Legal and Ethical Ramifications of Refusing to Treat Unvaccinated Children

Dear Pediatricians:

Physicians who refuse to treat unvaccinated children due to a parent’s exercise of a lawful exemption to immunizations may be violating the parent’s Constitutional rights and state ethical rules, and risking liability and/or sanctions accordingly.[1,2]

First, if you refuse to treat a child for the sole reason that a parent is exercising a vaccine religious exemption, you may be violating the parent’s Constitutional rights. State vaccine religious exemption laws are backed by the First Amendment’s “free exercise” Constitutional protection. Even private practices may be at risk, if they accept Medicaid and Medicare, as private entities with substantial ties to government may be considered “state actors” for purposes of application of the Constitution directly to those private entities.[3] State constitutional religious freedom rights may be violated as well.

Religious freedom is not a trivial matter. Federal courts in vaccine religious exemption cases have held that the “loss of First Amendment Freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury”[4] and have awarded money damages for the loss of First Amendment rights.[5] Thus, pediatricians should tread cautiously where vaccine religious exemptions are concerned.

Ethical concerns apply to the exercise of both religious and philosophical exemptions. For example, refusing to treat exempt children:

• Contradicts medical association recommendations;[6]
• Punishes innocent children for their parents’ decision, and potentially puts those innocent children at risk from the resulting loss of medical care; and
• Punishes law-abiding parents for exercising a legal right, and without good cause, as the lawful exercise of a vaccine exemption, by both legislative presumption and CDC statistics and accepted medical theory, does not create a significant health risk — e.g., non-immune vaccinated kids greatly outnumber exempt kids.[7]

Finally, this refusal policy raises serious professionalism concerns. A threat of refusal to treat is a discriminatory coercive act; refusing to treat an act of authoritarian punishment. In short, these behaviors amount to professional bullying. Worse, they are completely misplaced. State legislatures would not have enacted exemption laws if their exercise would cause a significant risk to anyone. If you disagree, the proper target for your concern is the state legislature — not parents exercising a right granted by lawmakers who have already determined that the exercise of exemptions poses no significant risks.

A related misunderstanding concerns the fact that state exemption laws generally allow one parent to exercise the exemption, without requiring the consent of the other parent. In contrast, vaccinating a child usually requires both parents’ consent, since parents generally share decision-making authority over their children equally unless a law or court order says otherwise. Again, those who object may address their concerns with their state representatives, since legislators — not parents — make the laws.

To be clear, an unvaccinated child whose parents are not exercising a lawful exemption may pose a legitimate liability risk, as those parents may not be in compliance with the law. In this case, you may be justified in requiring a waiver from the parents, or in temporarily refusing to treat a child until the parents vaccinate or a parent exercises an exemption. Of course, ethics would require that any child needing immediate medical attention be treated promptly, regardless of the child’s vaccination status.

For the above reasons, the policy of refusing to treat legally exempt, unvaccinated children is improper and should cease immediately. But this is also a matter of common sense. Bullying tactics will not change parents’ minds, but it will generate resentment that will add to the ongoing erosion of public confidence in the medical profession. Mature, intelligent discourse on vaccine concerns may create mutual respect and understanding of contrasting concerns. Alternative and complementary medicine has grown steadily for decades now. Medical doctors would serve themselves and others better by tolerating alternative vaccine views, as they are clearly here to stay.[8]

Alan Phillips, J.D. is a leading U.S. Vaccine Rights attorney who works with clients and legislative activists around the U.S. on vaccine exemption and waiver rights and legal issues. For more information, see http://www.vaccinerights.com.

———
[1] This letter is for educational purposes only, and not intended to constitute medical or legal advice.
[2] As voluminous information exists elsewhere substantiating parents’ exemption choices, this letter will focus instead on legal and ethical considerations only. Sources for such information are available on request.
[3] See, e.g., Opinion No. GA-0420, April 6, 2006, Attorney General of Texas, Gregg Abbott, stating that private schools in Texas do not have to accept religious exemptions unless the school accepts state funds.
[4] Berg v. Glen Cove City School Dist., 853 F. Supp. 651, 654 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 2689, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976)).
[5] Lewis v. Sobel, 710 F. Supp. 506, 517 (S.D.N.Y. 1989).
[6] More Doctors ‘Fire’ Vaccine Refusers, The Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2012.
[7] E.g., 5 – 15% of vaccinated children are not immune, while exemption rates run from 1 – 2.5%. See “Vaccine Exemptions: Do They Really Put Others at Risk?”, Natural News, February 21, 2012, http://www.naturalnews.com
[8] See, e.g., Thomson Reuters-NPR Health Poll Finds One in Four Americans Believe Vaccines are Unsafe, September 30, 2011, http://www.prnewswire.com Majority Support Parental Vaccination Choice According To New Harris Poll, PR Newswire, May 24, 2010, http://www.prnewswire.com and 52% Concerned About Safety of Vaccines, Rasmussen Reports, August 20, 2010, http://www.rasmussenreports.com.

About the author:
Alan Phillips, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 3473
Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473
919-960-5172
Vaccine Rights: http://www.vaccinerights.com
The Pandemic Response Project: http://www.pandemicresponseproject.com

Read Full Post »

Mechanically separated meat, a paste made by pulverizing animal carcasses, is used in hot dogs, burgers, lunch meat and Spam

naturalnews.com printable article
Originally published February 28 2012

Mechanically separated meat, a paste made by pulverizing animal carcasses, is used in hot dogs, burgers, lunch meat and Spam

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) Have you ever glanced at the ingredients on a hot dog or a can of Spam Lite and wondered about an ingredient called “mechanically separated chicken” or “mechanically separated meat”? This type of meat is collected from animal carcasses after all the prime cuts of muscle have been removed.

In order to not waste the meat scraps still clinging to the bone, slaughterhouses remove the meat either by scraping, pressing or shaving the scraps off the bone, or by simply blasting it with pressurized air or water. The meat comes off in a reddish slurry, which is then mixed into low-grade meat products such as hot dogs and lunchmeat in order to bulk them up.

Other common end products for mechanically separated meat include hamburger, ground beef, canned meat and processed meat products such as Slim Jims. Mechanically separated meat is also known as mechanically recovered meat, mechanically reclaimed meat and mechanically deboned meat.

The Health Ranger recently posted a video containing the popular “Mechanically Separated Chicken” animation. Watch it here:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=64AF35AC1C82EA864DD2B4D1C8A416BA

A related video featuring celebrity chef Jamie Oliver demonstrates how mechanically separated chicken is made:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=75F52E185F953F121E6138A2D1BA8730

Source: 25 Amazing (and Weird) Facts about How Food is Made and Where it Comes From, authored by Mike Adams and David Guiterrez. This report reveals shocking but true things that will blow your mind about how food is actually made. Click here to download the full report (FREE) (PDF Adobe Acrobat, non-DRM), and you’ll learn about weird food ingredients, food manufacturing processes and bizarre food sources. FREE report from NaturalNews.com.

Additional sources:

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/17-09/st_whatsinside

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1482140.stm

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Factsheets/Hot_Dogs/index.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanically_separated_chicken

Read Full Post »

Ta’leem and Tarbiyat Series #3 Ta’leem and Tarbiyat Series #3

Ta’leem and Tarbiyat Series #3

Qur’aan and Tafseer

“…and nor (the path of) those who went astray.”
(Surah Faatihah, 7)

“Those who went astray” are the Nasaara. The trait of deviation was overwhelming in them. The reason for this is that on account of their love for this worldly life they were neglectful and indifferent . Thus, their trait of being astray is expressed here, although in the Aakhirat they, too, will be the target of Allah’s wrath.
(Ashrafut Tafaaseer)

Hadeeth and Sunnah

Describing the facial beauty of Rasoolullah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) the Sahaabi, Hazrat Hind Bin Abu Haalah said: “He had a radiant complexion, broad forehead, beautifully arched and well-formed eyebrows that were not joined, elevated nose, a shine emanated from his nose…” (Nashrut Teeb)

Once, Rasoolullah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) passed by a dead kid-goat with small ears. He asked the Sahaabah who among them would take the dead kid-goat for a dirham (silver coin). The Sahaabah (Radhiyallahu anhum) replied that they would not take it even gratis. Upon this response, Rasoolullah (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) remarked:
“Wallah! This world is more contemptible to Allah than this is to you.”
(Mishkaat)

Fiqh and Masaail

1. For straightening the Saff in Salaah care should be taken to align the ankles. By aligning the ankles the shoulders will be aligned as the alignment of one necessitates the alignment of the other. The purport of the Hadeeth speaking of the ankles, shoulders and necks “clinging” to each other is this alignment. One Hadeeth explains the another.
2. Q. A person gave a thousand rands of Zakaat money to a yateem khana (orphanage). Food was purchased and prepared with the Zakaat money, and fed to the orphans. Is the Zakaat discharged?
A. Tamleek or giving the Zakaat money in ownership to the poor is a condition for the validity of Zakaat. In preparing food with the Zakaat money and feeding the orphans, tamleek was missing. The Zakaat, therefore, is not discharged.
(Ashraful Ahkaam)

Tasawwuf and Sulook

1. If one’s gaze goes to one’s righteousness and the next person’s shortcoming, it is then obligatory to think that the possibility exists for there to be some virtue in that person and some evil in one, due to which that person is better in the Eye of Allah. This much is sufficient for one to be acquitted of kibr (pride).
2. The need of the hour is for everyone to be concerned about his/her self-reformation and betterment. Nowadays the sickness of concern for other people’s actions and unconsciousness of one’s own doings has reached epidemic proportion; affecting all and sundry. It is foolishness to lose one’s baggage for the sake of watching over someone else’s seat.
(Kamaalaat-e-Ashrafiyyah)

Read Full Post »

The Mujahideen are alive in their Graves!

Taliban bodys don’t decay

The committee of the American Red Cross has released a report on its webpage regarding the bodies of the dead (martyred) Taliban compared to those of the foreign forces. The mentioned committee which had the duty of collecting and burying the dead in Mazar Sharif province of Afghanistan showed its astonishment as to why the dead bodies of Taliban had not decayed or gave off foul smell?!! The report said that investigators initially thought that the cold weather was the reason behind this phenomenon however this theory was later shattered because the bodies of the northern alliance fighters which were lying in the same area had decayed and were also giving off a nauseating smell.

The report further says that it now wants to conduct a research on the type of food consumed by the Taliban fighters! The researchers also want to find out if there is a relationship between food and blood because the blood of some Taliban members keeps its warm temperatures even after their death!

(Source: Al-Misryoon, Ana Muslim and several other websites.)

Read Full Post »

Taubah

Reminder Concerning Tawbah

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu,

Yesterday Shaykh Zulfiqar Ahmad (may Allah preserve his legacy) gave a very beautiful, and practical, reminder on turning in repentance to Allah Most High. I wanted to share a few of the points he made for those who were not able to listen to the talk.

1. Detached Yourself from Bad Company

Everyone is responsible for their own actions, but the company we keep strongly influences the decisions we make and can often be the impetus leading us to sin. Imam Ghazali mentions that a bad companion is worse than the bite of a snake, since the poison of a snake only kills the body, whereas the poison of a bad companion kills one’s iman.

He further explains that a bad companion is actually worse than shaytan, since while shaytan will plant the idea to sin in our heart, he does not compel us to act. It is our doing which takes that idea and manifests it in sin. But when a friend calls us toward sin, he not only plants the idea in our mind, but grabs our hand and drags us toward the sin.

2. Make Tawbah from Two Sides

As soon as we disobey Allah Most High, we should ideally turn to Him in sincere repentance. However many times we may not realize the mistake right away, or be so caught up in it, that we don’t care. So once we recognize the disobedience, we need to make tawbah from two sides:

a. Tawbah from the disobedience, and

b. Tawbah from the delay in making tawbah.

3. Fulfilling Rights is Part of Tawbah

Part of tawbah is having remorse and asking for forgiveness, but we must also ensure that the rights due upon us are fulfilled. Some of these are the rights of Allah, for example making up missed prayers and fasts, paying our overdue zakah, etc., while others are the rights of the servants of Allah, for example compensating for any financial loss (i.e in the case of theft), apologizing to someone if we backbit or spoke inappropriately to them, etc.

4. A Common Deterrent to Tawbah

We have all made our fair share of mistakes (may Allah forgive us), but sometimes shaytan tricks us into thinking, “I have so many sins, how can they all be forgiven. There is no point in making tawbah!” The key is not to look at the sins, however numerous and horrific they may be, but rather to look at the one forgiving the sins; how perfect and merciful is He!

5. A Common Complaint After Tawbah

“I made tawbah, but bad memories of the sin linger.” If the tawbah was sincere, the memories will dissipate over time. Focus on creating good memories in the meantime (i.e. acts of obedience), and on increasing your daily dhikr (so that the remembrance of Allah can replace the whisperings of shaytan).

These were just a few of the reminders; may Allah Most High forgive my shortcomings in presenting the words of our beloved Shaykh.

The most needy of servants,

khalid abdul sattar

http://www.ilmessentials.com/general/reminder-concerning-tawbah.html

Read Full Post »

The need for Hijaab

The need for Hijaab
By admin on 2-27-2012 in Ahsan al- Qasas

An Original Dar al – Mahmood.org article
Mufti Ebrahim Desai

“I always say the common women are genuinely chaste but the other women in their level of chastity are like damsels of Paradise. There are some who till today have not even seen another man and in respect to the damsels of paradise Allah Ta’ala offers the same description, “Therein, maidens restrained of glance!” and also amongst the virtue of women “Unaware believing women!”. We understand that for women to be unaware of the outside elements should be their natural disposition. And here despite the real meaning of this Ayaat being to be unaware of immorality and not general ignorance. Even in men to be unaware of immorality is desired but despite this it has been specifically mentioned for women and not in respect to men.
From here it is clearly understood that even general ignorance is more appropriate for women. Now these insensible people say, “take off the veil and progress!” They have no limits for anything. Strange dung is filled in their minds, my heart testifies that these people will never be successful. Allah Ta’ala will assist his Deen. Due to which the women of this type will never accept this.
Once in respect to the same topic whilst speaking I mentioned, “In the issue of the veil there is no need to even bring Quran or Hadith, since without Quran or Hadith the need of the veil can be proven. I say, these people must have traveled abroad a train. And they must have also carried some money. Have they also ever done this, where they keep this money outside of their pockets? Or do they instead keep their money in such a pocket which is within a pocket? So is this injunction of keeping money in a pocket within a pocket found in the Quran?
The only reason for this is because to expose such money would put the money in danger. Just like this, here it is a natural demand that because of a similar danger it is necessary to conceal. Over and above this it is a demand of one’s manly disposition that one keeps the women in veil. It is a natural consequence without the command of Shari’ah to understand concealment to be necessary. Rather the danger that lies in keeping women out of the veil is even greater than the danger in exposing ones cash. Money at most maybe the value of a few thousand of which you value so much as to conceal, but women you don’t even have this much value for?” Those listening remained silent and never spoke.

Read Full Post »

Curcumin is a potent tool in the war against prostate cancer and dementia

naturalnews.com printable article
Originally published February 27 2012

Curcumin is a potent tool in the war against prostate cancer and dementia
by John Phillip
See all articles by this author

(NaturalNews) Curcumin, the active anti-inflammatory compound found in the Indian spice tumeric, has gained an impressive reputation in the fight against many deadly forms of cancer. New evidence released in the journal Cancer Research finds that the natural phenol can slow prostate tumor growth by blocking receptors used to propagate cell tissue growth.

Additional research published in the journal PLoS One explains the precise mechanism exerted by curcumin molecules to target the amyloid fibrils associated with the unnatural progression of protein-like plaque tangles that are characteristic in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Adding curry spice to your healthy diet or supplementing daily with a standardized curcumin capsule will help win your individual war against cancerous proliferation and Alzheimer’s dementia.

Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of the disease, with more than 250,000 diagnoses in the US each year. Any natural compound that targets the proliferation of prostate cancer cells would provide a significant remedy compared with the allopathic methods of radiation, surgery and chemical agents. To conduct the study, researchers subjected prostate cancer cells to hormone deprivation in the presence and absence of curcumin with ‘physiologically attainable’ doses.

Curcumin blocks prostate cell receptors to thwart cancer progression
The researchers found that curcumin blocked two genetic receptors necessary for prostate cancer advancement. These receptors have been shown is past studies to predict cancer incidence and rate of growth of existing tumors. They noted that the spice extract was “a potent inhibitor of both cell cycle and survival in prostate cancer cells.”

The lead study author, Dr. Karen Knudsen and her team found that other cancer cell lines multiply by a similar receptor mechanism and may also be inhibited by the curry compound. She commented that curcumin “also has implications beyond prostate cancer… in other malignancies, like breast cancer. In tumors where these play an important function, curcumin may prove to be a promising therapeutic agent.”

In a separate research body, scientists found that curcumin prolongs life and enhances activity of brain neurons, acting as a neuroprotective shield against Alzheimer’s disease advancement. The research team determined that curcumin acted to prevent the damaging accumulation of amyloid fibrils around the nerve synapse. Amyloid tangles are known to prevent normal electrical and chemical transmissions required to form memories and maintain cognition.

Scientific research models continue to extol the virtues of natural spice and herbal extracts such as curcumin to help prevent and treat many deadly diseases that kill countless millions each year. Incorporate curry spices as part of your healthy diet or include a daily supplement (250 mg to 500 mg standardized curcumin extract) to significantly lower cancer risk and support healthy brain function.

Sources for this article include:

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org

http://www.nutraingredients.com

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120210105859.htm

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/241647.php

About the author:
John Phillip is a Health Researcher and Author who writes regularly on the cutting edge use of diet, lifestyle modifications and targeted supplementation to enhance and improve the quality and length of life. John is the author of ‘Your Healthy Weight Loss Plan’, a comprehensive EBook explaining how to use Diet, Exercise, Mind and Targeted Supplementation to achieve your weight loss goal. Visit My Optimal Health Resource to continue reading the latest health news updates, and to download your Free 48 page copy of ‘Your Healthy Weight Loss Plan’.

Read Full Post »

Mainstream column admits vaccines cause cancer in pets

naturalnews.com printable article
Originally published February 27 2012

Mainstream column admits vaccines cause cancer in pets
by Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Did you know that vaccinating your cat with the typical, recommended feline vaccination schedule may lead to your furry friend developing cancer? In a recent article published in The Ledger, Karri Miller, Central Florida’s only full-time board certified veterinary oncologist, admits that inflammation caused by vaccines can cause some cats to develop cancer years down the road — and yet she still recommends that people have their pets vaccinated.

A telling admission about the serious risks associated with vaccines, Miller’s report highlights the fact that at least one out of every 10,000 cats develops “vaccine-associated sarcomas” as a result of getting vaccinated. Whether it is the mandatory rabies vaccine, or the host of other viral and bacterial vaccines commonly administered to felines, vaccinated cats admittedly have an increased risk of developing cancer in response to the injections.

Vaccine task force says keep injecting cats with cancer-causing vaccines, but do so in spots that will be easy to remove tumors later
The issue has become so serious, in fact, that the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) developed a “Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force” (VAFSTF) back in 1996 to keep track of the prevalence of the condition, and to investigate ways to help mitigate and prevent it. Besides simply not vaccinating cats at all, the only thing this task force has really come up with so far as a solution is to simply inject vaccines in different spots on cats’ bodies so that, should a tumor end up developing there, it will be easy to treat it with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation (http://www.avma.org/vafstf/sitercmnd.asp).

In other words, vaccines will continue to cause cancer in cats, so the best way, in these experts’ minds, to address the problem is to inject vaccines in areas that will be easier for surgeons to access in the event that they have to remove a tumor at the site. Never would these experts caution cat owners against getting the harmful vaccines in the first place, of course, or at the very least reduce the number of vaccines they choose to get for their cats.

In her article, for example, Miller actually suggests that cat owners continue to get their cats vaccinated with whatever vaccines their veterinarians recommend because “[t]he risk of developing a tumor from a vaccine may be much less than your cat catching a deadly virus that could have been prevented with a vaccine,” in her opinion. And if your cat does get cancer, Miller, of course, recommends surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy as appropriate treatment.

However, according to Dr. Don Hamilton, a veterinary homeopath in New Mexico, most pet vaccines are largely useless anyway because they cause “at least as much illness as they have ever prevented.” In many cases, he says, vaccines simply do not offer the protection their advocates claim they do, and they typically weaken pets’ immune systems and create more chronic illness than if those pets were allowed to simply develop their own natural immunity through proper nutrition (http://www.holisticat.com/vaccinations.html).

Sources for this article include:

http://www.theledger.com/article/20120218/COLUMNISTS/202185001

Read Full Post »

Study: Combination tetanus, whooping cough vaccine linked to seizures in babies

naturalnews.com printable article
Originally published February 26 2012

Study: Combination tetanus, whooping cough vaccine linked to seizures in babies
by Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) If you choose to have your baby vaccinated with the combination diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough (pertussis), polio and Haemophilus influenzae type 2 vaccine, a mega-jab collectively known as the DTap-IPV-Hib, your child may be at an increased risk of having a vaccine-induced seizure. A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association has identified a clear link between the vaccine and the onset of fever-related seizures, which the authors claim will not cause long-term damage.

Yuelian Sun from Aarhus University in Denmark and her colleagues evaluated data on roughly 380,000 babies born in Denmark between 2003 and 2008. Children in that country are recommended to get the vaccine at three different times — once when they are three months old, again when they are five months old, and a third time on their first birthday. Upon analysis, the researchers determined that about 7,800 of these children, or just over two percent, had been diagnosed with a fever-related seizure by the time they reach one-and-a-half years old.

The risk of having a fever-related seizure appears to increase after each subsequent jab with the vaccine, and particularly on the same day that it is administered. And yet the study authors and others insist the DTap-IPV-Hib vaccine is safe because such seizures allegedly do not cause brain damage or other permanent harm. Dr. Eugene Shapiro, a pediatrics and infectious diseases researcher at Yale University, actually purports that these findings are “reassuring,” and that parents should not be concerned.

Even more absurd was study author Sun’s response to the findings, in which she suggested that perhaps injected babies who had a seizure in response to the vaccine were just genetically prone to seizures, and that the vaccine had nothing to do with it. This and other nonsensical responses to studies that identify health risks associated with vaccines are typical. It is always anything but the vaccine that is responsible for causing harm — “Have you ever drunk raw milk at any time in your life? That must have been the cause of the seizure!”

DTap-IPV-Hib vaccine loaded with bacterial components, antibiotics, and toxic chemicals and additives
According to the Vaccine Awareness Network, the DTap-IPV-Hib vaccine contains diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, five components of the bordetella pertussis bacteria, filamentous haemagglutinin (the component of the bacteria which causes infection), pertactin (a highly immunogenic virulence factor), three types of inactivated polio virus, types 1, 2 and 3, a component of Haemophilus influenzae type B that has been attached to tetanus toxoid to make babies produce more antibodies, and three different types of antibiotics — neomycin, streptomycin, and polymyxin B.

Besides this barrage of pathogens and pathogenic components, the vaccine also contains deadly preservatives and additives like formaldehyde (rat poison), 2-phenoxyethanol (a detergent that is the main ingredient in anti-freeze), aluminum, and polysorbate 80 (an emulsifier implicated in causing male infertility).

There are also more than 3,500 reports in the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) about serious adverse events associated with the DTap-IPV-Hib vaccine. These include, but are not limited to, Moraxella catarrhalis, streptococcus pneumonia, asthma, anaphylactic reactions, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and meningitis.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.reuters.com

http://text.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccines-And-How-They-Are-Made

http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

Read Full Post »

Pasteurized milk 150 times more contaminated with blood, pus and feces than fresh milk – videos the CDC won’t show you

naturalnews.com printable article

Originally published February 22 2012

Pasteurized milk 150 times more contaminated with blood, pus and feces than fresh milk – videos the CDC won’t show you

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor 

(NaturalNews) The vaccine-pushing, disease scare-mongering agency known as the CDC has put out a stunning piece of propaganda attacking fresh milk (raw dairy), claiming it is “150 times more dangerous” than pasteurized milk. This is all part of their anti-American agenda to crush food freedom and criminalize fundamental farming practices upon which this very nation was founded. (Yes, George Washington and the founding fathers drank raw milk, grew hemp and even smoked a little weed as medicine.)

But what the CDC won’t dare reveal to the public is the far more horrifying truth: Pasteurized dairy is produced in the dirtiest milk factories imaginable, where blood, pus, e.coli and other truly dangerous pathogens are routinely bottled into milk containers and fed to consumers.

That’s the whole point of pasteurization, you see: To kill everything that might be alive in their ultra-dirty milk. The real purpose of pasteurization is not to simply “make milk safe” as is claimed by the CDC, but rather to allow the dairy industry to operate DIRTY. It’s so much easier to just cook the crap out of the milk (yes, there’s fecal matter in it) than to clean up their operations, get it?

Thanks to pasteurization, conventional (non-organic, non-raw) dairy operators have no need to thoroughly wash their milking machines, no need to sterilize any milk containers, no need to wash their hands, and no need to maintain a clean milking environment whatsoever. It’s just total filth with festering diseased animals dying on the floor and being physically abused by the corporate dairy operators (see video links, below).

Dairy cows are routinely abused and left to suffer in total filth

Want to know how conventional (pasteurized) dairy cows are really treated? Here’s something the CDC won’t show you.

Watch this highly disturbing video of dairy cows being kicked, tortured, abused and injured by conventional dairy workers. This was filmed with an undercover spy cam (WARNING: DISTURBING IMAGERY):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUmtSONLhOc

When you buy pasteurized milk at the grocery store, you are supporting an industry that tortures cows and produces a dirty, filthy product!

Of course, the dairy industry would much rather force everybody to pasteurize their milk and outlaw clean raw dairy than to clean up their own act. That’s the whole point of the CDC going after raw dairy: To destroy the raw dairy industry and force everyone to drink dirty, contaminated pasteurized milk that’s extracted from tortured cows.

Here are some other short videos you may want to view (WARNING):

Dairy Cow Abuse – “Mercy For Animals” hidden camera in New York:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdiwZKsrgdA

The disgusting treatment of (conventional) dairy cows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzS8p727gvM

Dairy cows with injuries and infections:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrMj0oBdyWs

ABC Nightline – Dairy farm abuse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIRshcfNLDk

So get it through your heads, folks: If you buy pasteurized, homogenized milk, you are supporting an industry of filth, torture, infected animals and dirty, dirty milk.

Blood, pus, bacteria and fecal matter – drink up, kiddies!

The reason all that milk has to be pasteurized is because it’s strongly contaminated with:

• blood
• pus
• bacteria
• fecal matter

In addition, conventional dairy cows are:

• Pumped full of bovine growth hormones
• Fed masses of antibiotics
• Fed tons of GMOs such as corn and soy
• Heavily contaminated with chemical pesticides

That’s what you get when you buy “Pasteurized” milk. Plus the feces in the milk, of course.

So the next time somebody gets mad at you in bumper-to-bumper traffic and they scream out the window: “EAT SH*T!” just hand them a glass of pasteurized milk. Let them drink it, huh?

The cleanest milk in the world? RAW, fresh milk!

You want to see a super clean dairy operation? Go to a raw dairy farm and check out their operation. It’s the cleanest, most pristine dairy operation you’ll ever find. And why? Because it has to be. If you want to produce clean, fresh dairy without pasteurization, you have to run a super clean facility with healthy cows, stringent cleanliness practices and a commitment to producing wholesome food.

Only raw milk dairies have this kind of commitment to cleanliness.

View this powerful comparison between pasteurized milk and raw milk:
http://organicpastures.com/whyraw.html

In fact, if you took a gallon of unpasteurized milk from a conventional dairy and you compared it to a gallon of unpasteurized milk from a quality-certified raw milk dairy, I have no doubt you would find that the conventional dairy has at least 150 times the level of blood, pus, feces and dangerous bacteria (if not more).

In contrast, raw milk from a reputable dairy operation such as Organic Pastures (www.OrganicPastures.com) is the cleanest milk on the planet, bar none. Sure, it has friendly bacteria in it, but that bacteria is good for you — it’s probiotics. The CDC, of course, is so clueless about infectious disease that they hate ALL bacteria and want to destroy them all with chemicals or heat.

The CDC won’t dare discuss any of this, however. Instead, the CDC has resorted to what can only be called a raw milk fear mongering campaignusing the exact same tactic they used to promote vaccine sales by pushing false swine flu fear.

The only thing dirtier than pasteurized milk, it seems, is the CDC itself, which has degraded from a once-respected group of actual scientists to a cabal of junk science fear mongerers and political prostitutes who drop trow and bend over for Big Business (Big Pharma, Big Dairy, etc.) at every opportunity. Instead of doing something important to stop the spread of infectious disease (like promoting vitamin D, immune-boosting nutrition and improved sanitation), the CDC is now a total sellout to the interests of the corporate giants who feed us filth and call it food.

So it’s no surprise to see the CDC promoting pasteurized milk — the very product whose digestive enzymes have been destroyed so that it causesallergic reactions in those who consume it.

Pasteurized, homogenized milk also promotes heart disease, obesity, autoimmune disorders, constipation, sinus congestion and many other chronic health conditions. It is the perfect food for the uninformed masses who the U.S. government seems to be trying to keep in a state of lifelong disease and medical enslavement.

Keep reading NaturalNews to learn more about what’s wrong with conventional pasteurized dairy products. We’re working on several articles covering this topic.

And remember:

Pasteurized milk is so disgustingly dirty that if they didn’t kill everything in it with heat, the liquid would probably kill YOU.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/21/feds-fresh-milk-150-t…

http://organicpastures.com/

www.RealMilk.com

www.WestonAPrice.org

 

Read Full Post »